Dominance in East Asia and Japan as the core conflict

 Title: The dominance of East Asia and Japan as the core of the original conflict
: ordinary people Zhang Yan (CHQ)
Time: 2005.12
starter: Langya Chinese Culture Forum (www.langya.org)
Statement : do not mind reproduced, but please indicate the original author and source, thank you!
2005 年 can be described as the year of Sino-Japanese conflict intensified, from Japan to allow Lee Teng-hui to visit Japan early next year, university students boycott demonstrations to Speculation about Chunxiao Oilfield test mining of the old submarines quietly arrived in the coastal areas recently, the Sino-Japanese competition for Russian oil, historical issues surrounding the war of words in Japan and South Korea, to Japan's military attache to enhance the power given to the right of self-defense corps more fighting, the introduction of the program to revise its constitution, until provocative use of the water pollution problem in Japan in late Sino-Russian relations, ASEAN - the East Asia Summit on the .
from ASEAN - can be seen on the East Asia Summit, China and Japan battle for dominance in East Asia is very fierce. Historically, Japan has the absolute peak of dominance in East Asia (of course without regard to U.S. influence), but Since the experience of the strong, and its attention gradually shifted from a foreign country, East to hear China's voice more. And with this relative, the Japanese influence is declining, the initiative gradually disappear. Thus, the early 21st century East Asia, is bound to put on old and new forces over the ownership of the scene. the current ASEAN - the scramble for dominance in the East Asia Summit is the bridgehead.
the past two years, the Japanese out of the mainstream in some way to re-establish dominance in the region is imperative. (It is worth pondering is that the recovery of the old forces is precisely based on the rise of emerging powers on.) summit in Japan issued the ; speech, eager to re-establish the kind of leaders in the eighties of last century the position and prestige in Asia, towards the establishment of practical measures are already in favor of the the old forces to re-establish the dominance of a strong request to the delicate strokes of the patients dealt with gently.
present, China is still not enough to power a positive, comprehensive rival Japan, trying to link highly valued in Japan, direct confrontation, no doubt it would be unwise The. Therefore array, the Chinese on the defensive and appropriate, be made target for the resistance at the initiative, rather than trying to rush to rally with them. Thus, ASEAN has become China's great pressure on the transfer object. this means subtlety lies, determined to take their interests are strong enough not to allow competitors to go to, but should not try to drag a person the power to become their opponents into the water, the benefits of being , and then try to get back. from a weaker than the interests of their hands are better than a strong opponent from the hands get, much easier.
In Japan, as if the bounder general, frequent moves, forays, strong exception, but difficult of results. vast consecutive offensive, are feminine in China, even insidious deceitful practices may be called to the damage. previous Japanese joint India and Pakistan, Germany, strongly position the permanent members for gold element of a wave after wave of attack; South Korea and China on the one hand encouraged the forced competition for dominance in East Asia, it is assumed a serious array of potential, did not expect a mind of Chinese Tai Chi hand, is not involved in competition for dominance and instead make it with high-profile people, like the Japanese for the war but no war.
CAO line: .
once, I think the day is the root cause of conflict resources, the two countries for oil, the East China Sea there are incompatible, irreconcilable contradictions, until this time, really realized that the core issue is the old and new forces in fierce battle in the area dominance! what historical issues, resource problems are around the excuse in the ownership of the surrounding countertop.
historical issues, is to ensure that Japan can do all the necessary conditions of competition for dominance.
now look , the two countries are determined to achieve dominance in East Asia. after the end of the Cold War, regional dominance more through the effects of soft power to obtain, but it does not mean that military means would be useless. As the mainland's Taiwan policy of , but never give up the use of force tried to revive the eighties of last century leadership, faced with the challenge of China's emerging power, China-Japan war is the soft power of the two sides after the final fight to make a hand to Japan's national identity is not to give up executive a trump card for. from the Japanese point of view, if the bow of the historical issues and recognize the evil of war sixty years ago, from now on as long as the military deals with China, cards, the Japanese were only a bow, what emboldened to expand the military? then, as now, like Germany, where one Jewish, German only bow were mistaken, there can be little resistance. So long as Japan want to fight initiative, we can not give up the military card, rather than give up the use of force is a prerequisite for a license not to bow to historical issues.
I believe that the Hu-Wen government also made it clear that China can not abandon the question of history demanded that Japan make a reflection, this as a check, but also for the moral basis for the establishment of Sino-Japanese War.
resources, is the dominance of the interests of the extension.
What is the purpose to obtain ownership? nothing more than to secure a location for their own survival development environment, territory, territorial waters, airspace security, the well-being of their people is the most important, well-being rely on to improve? resources. to absorb more resources into the country, the country, social assets increased, the state assets directly affected the power of the state apparatus, rational system of social assets allocated to the public directly affects the well-being. Japan is now in the resource constraints on China issue everywhere, is it the introduction of his existing resources are insufficient to meet the country's people? No. He is absorbed in the restrictions on Chinese the amount of resources, restrictions on Chinese state, the improvement of social assets, social assets, malaise people to poverty, hardship and national assets sagging troops, the military difficulties of the poor people of China but also how to compete with the Japanese dominance in East Asia?
dominance in East Asia, history issues, resource issues and a variety of series of conflicts between China and Japan to dominance as the core, and serve. as long as both countries are also the desire to retain ownership, then this series of contradictions will compete with both and continue until one side fails to exit the game in this expensive state.